lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x498vyw7qe7.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 07 Jan 2011 09:13:52 -0500
From:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blktrace: add missing probe argument to block_bio_complete

Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> writes:

> blktrace.c block bio complete callback needs to gain a new argument to reflect
> the newly added "error" tracepoint argument. This is needed to match the new
> block_bio_complete TRACE_EVENT as of
> commit de983a7bfcb7c020901ca6e2314cf55a4207ab5a.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
> CC: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
> CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> CC: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/blktrace.c |    3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
> @@ -785,7 +785,8 @@ static void blk_add_trace_bio_bounce(voi
>  }
>  
>  static void blk_add_trace_bio_complete(void *ignore,
> -				       struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
> +				       struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio,
> +				       int error)
>  {
>  	blk_add_trace_bio(q, bio, BLK_TA_COMPLETE);
>  }

OK, I clearly didn't look closely enough last time.  There's no sense
passing this information down if it isn't used (as you said initially).
blk_add_trace_bio sets the error based on whether or not the
BIO_UPTODATE bit is set.  So, I think we should instead revert the patch
I sent you (Mathieu), and then completely get rid of the error field in
the TP macros.

Does that make sense to everyone else?

Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ