[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin0eXCpLD1B0+zABqYcWxzG8+kM1cpRyD+Af_2n@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 08:26:23 -0700
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
Cc: spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi_imx.c: correct the test on platform_get_irq() return value
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com> wrote:
> The test "if (spi_imx->irq <= 0)" is not testing the IRQ value, but the return value of platform_get_irq().
> As platform_get_irq() can return an error (-ENXIO) or the IRQ value it found, the test should be "if (spi_imx->irq < 0)"
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
For the majority of architectures in Linux, 0 is not a valid IRQ for
devices. Unless there is an actual imx platform that currently
assigns linux irq 0 to the spi controller then I'd rather not apply
this change.
g.
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi_imx.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi_imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi_imx.c
> index 55a38e2..793ae99 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi_imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi_imx.c
> @@ -847,7 +847,7 @@ static int __devinit spi_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> spi_imx->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> - if (spi_imx->irq <= 0) {
> + if (spi_imx->irq < 0) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto out_iounmap;
> }
> --
> 1.7.1
>
>
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists