linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTim_Su1XTvvpFvPqv1xpkkUA3PEVDEVpXaODjYpt@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 7 Jan 2011 19:04:56 +0100
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> On 2011-01-07 15:22, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 14:19:33 +0100 Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hmm, I have pulled-in freshly from linux-2.6-block#for-next after you
>>> published latest linux-next (next-20110107).
>>> So, I guessed the (reported) issue is fixed, now.
>>
>> No, the commit that caused the warnings was removed when I went back to
>> using the block tree from next-20110106.  So it will come back unless
>> fixed.
>
> It is fixed in linux-2.6-block#for-next as-of earlier today, so if Sedat
> pulled from there it should be gone.
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
>

I guess 0002 should fix it, its not the case (patch + "big diff" attached).

- Sedat -

sd@...x:~/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37/debian/patches$ LC_ALL=C ls -l
linux-2.6-block-for-next/
total 44
-rw-r--r-- 1 sd sd  5903 Jan  7 10:33
0001-block-add-internal-hd-part-table-references.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 sd sd  2382 Jan  7 10:33
0002-block-trace-event-block-fix-unassigned-field.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 sd sd  3400 Jan  7 10:33
0003-block-cfq-don-t-use-atomic_t-for-cfq_queue.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 sd sd  3387 Jan  7 10:33
0004-block-cfq-don-t-use-atomic_t-for-cfq_group.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 sd sd   403 Jan  7 10:33 Shortlog
-rw-r--r-- 1 sd sd   527 Jan  7 10:33 diffstat
-rw-r--r-- 1 sd sd 12797 Jan  7 10:33 linux-2.6-block-for-next.patch

Download attachment "0002-block-trace-event-block-fix-unassigned-field.patch" of type "plain/text" (2382 bytes)

Download attachment "linux-2.6-block-for-next.patch" of type "plain/text" (12797 bytes)