[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110107193547.GA28634@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 20:35:47 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@...ux.it>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
torbenh <torbenh@....de>, john.stultz@...aro.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Read THREAD_CPUTIME clock from other processes.
On 01/07, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> This can certainly be enhanced, but it opens some cans of worms about the
> security question. It is probably still considered an unsafe information
> leak to let every process examine every other process's thread clocks.
Yes, I was worried about possible security issues too. But, it seems,
/proc/pid/task/tid/stat (do_task_stat) shows ->utime/stime anyway.
And /proc/schedstat shows sum_exec_runtime.
> I'll leave that judgement to security folks.
Agreed.
> As well as the information leak, it is most certainly a DoS attack vector
> to allow one process to set CPU timers an another process or its threads.
No, the suggested change doesn't go that far, afaics. It only modifies
check_clock: this affects clock_getres and clock_set (which does nothing),
and posix_cpu_clock_get: affects clock_gettime().
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists