[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110107210152.GG7355@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:01:52 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] spinlock: Kill spin_unlock_wait()
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:26:35PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Jeff, Tejun, could you look at the ata-eh thing, then I'll put sorting
> through the futex thing on my todo list.
Hmm... I think the ->eng_timeout path is already dead. We no longer
have any in-kernel implementation, so killing spin_unlock_wait()
should be fine. I'll follow up with removal of the unused callback.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists