[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110107232339.GS21922@thunk.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 18:23:39 -0500
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mke2fs: page allocation failure w/ kernel 2.6.37
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 02:45:30PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2011, Toralf Förster wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I got this in /var/log/messages today (created a ext2 partition at an external USB drive, worked fine) :
> >
>
> Yeah, this failure is from the kmemleak stack which simply means that
> debugging tool will be disabled rather than any disruption to the
> workflow.
>
> I'm curious why kmemleak is masking with GFP_KERNEL and GFP_ATOMIC and not
> allowing users to pass __GFP_NOWARN to suppress this type of failure,
> especially since the stack trace is already emitted by kmemleak when it is
> stopped. Catalin?
Indeed, is there a reason why the kmemleak code is so noisy? And can
it display a more obvious message about what is going on? It took me
a while to figure out why it was unhappy, and whether there it was a
fault of the code it was testing, or just that it could get the memory
it needed....
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists