linux-kernel - Re: [058/152] tcp: protect sysctl_tcp_cookie

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 08 Jan 2011 07:57:15 -0500
From:	William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
CC:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [058/152] tcp: protect sysctl_tcp_cookie_size reads

On 1/8/11 6:58 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> Eric was *not* *truthful* saying there were "checkpatch.pl errors/warnings" in
> my code.
>
I've received a private email complaining that I've not properly attributed
the origin of the patch.  Given a person has already lied to me about this,
I'm not sure.  When it comes to personal integrity, it's "one strike and
you're out"!

Since Eric had previously reviewed the original code, surely any such error
would have been found by him at that time.  Perhaps he made a mistake?

However, I'm happy to add a Reported-by line.  If this is an error, hopefully
somebody will correct it.

View attachment "sysctl_tcp_cookie_size-read-once.patch" of type "text/plain" (1681 bytes)