linux-kernel - Loop devices not supported concurrent access ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 09 Jan 2011 02:10:21 +0100
From:	Gregory Auzanneau <greg@...light.net>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Loop devices not supported concurrent access ?

Hello All,

During some tests, I've remark an interesting issue with loop devices.
loop devices queues concurrent access by multi-threaded software.

This issue can easily be highlighted by this tool : 
http://box.houkouonchi.jp/seeker_baryluk.c
This tool permit to test how many iop/s your system can handle (don't 
forget to use deadline scheduler).

First of all, we will define a loop device on a raw device (raw device 
permit to avoid filesystem interaction) :
losetup /dev/loop1 /dev/sda5

Now we will test the number our raw device and our loop device can 
handle with only one thread :
./seeker_baryluk /dev/sda5 1 => Results: 196 seeks/second, 5.081 ms 
random access time
./seeker_baryluk /dev/loop1 1 => Results: 194 seeks/second, 5.131 ms 
random access time

Results : raw device and loop device have approximately the same 
performance with one thread.

Here is the problem : we will now test with 32 threads :
./seeker_baryluk /dev/sda5 32 => Results: 631 seeks/second, 1.585 ms 
random access time
./seeker_baryluk /dev/loop1 32 => Results: 194 seeks/second, 5.148 ms 
random access time

As you can see, loop device deals request one by one even with parrallel 
request.
This involve that we lost a lot of performance performed by NCQ/TCQ 
and/or disk balancing.

The same thing also appears in Xen when mapping a disk with a "file".

Is this problem solvable ?

/Thank you all for the good work with linux, keep up with it ! :)

Greg

/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/