[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D290AFD.40809@reolight.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 02:10:21 +0100
From: Gregory Auzanneau <greg@...light.net>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Loop devices not supported concurrent access ?
Hello All,
During some tests, I've remark an interesting issue with loop devices.
loop devices queues concurrent access by multi-threaded software.
This issue can easily be highlighted by this tool :
http://box.houkouonchi.jp/seeker_baryluk.c
This tool permit to test how many iop/s your system can handle (don't
forget to use deadline scheduler).
First of all, we will define a loop device on a raw device (raw device
permit to avoid filesystem interaction) :
losetup /dev/loop1 /dev/sda5
Now we will test the number our raw device and our loop device can
handle with only one thread :
./seeker_baryluk /dev/sda5 1 => Results: 196 seeks/second, 5.081 ms
random access time
./seeker_baryluk /dev/loop1 1 => Results: 194 seeks/second, 5.131 ms
random access time
Results : raw device and loop device have approximately the same
performance with one thread.
Here is the problem : we will now test with 32 threads :
./seeker_baryluk /dev/sda5 32 => Results: 631 seeks/second, 1.585 ms
random access time
./seeker_baryluk /dev/loop1 32 => Results: 194 seeks/second, 5.148 ms
random access time
As you can see, loop device deals request one by one even with parrallel
request.
This involve that we lost a lot of performance performed by NCQ/TCQ
and/or disk balancing.
The same thing also appears in Xen when mapping a disk with a "file".
Is this problem solvable ?
/Thank you all for the good work with linux, keep up with it ! :)
Greg
/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists