linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: early_quirk check all dev/func in domain 0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110110160117.GD5275@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:01:17 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: early_quirk check all dev/func in domain 0

On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 11:59:38AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 
> go with all buses instead of bus0.

Why?  Why limit yourself here?

What's to say I will not have a USB controller on the second domain?  If
you are going to change this, might as well be "correct", right?

Or, if it really doesn't matter, stick with what we have today.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/