[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B4C48E6D-6EEA-4FC4-9FA5-35818F230E0C@marvell.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 09:18:51 -0800
From: Philip Rakity <prakity@...vell.com>
To: Pierre Tardy <tardyp@...il.com>
CC: "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: add MMC_QUIRK_BROKEN_CLK_GATING
On Jan 10, 2011, at 8:57 AM, Pierre Tardy wrote:
>>
>>
>> Since the code is not called that often could you change the above code to:
>>
>>> if (mmc_card_sdio(card))
>>> return !(card->quirks & MMC_QUIRK_BROKEN_CLK_GATING);
> Well, The comment in the
>> return true;
>>
>> more obvious that quirk only applies to sdio.
>
> Disagree.Actually, before this code, there is a pretty long comment,
> that explain that this quirk only apply to sdio.
>
> If we figure out later that some sdcard does not like clock gating
> either, we could add this quirk to those bad sdcard as well.
I am okay with this -- if you resubmit -- just indicate the quirk is more generic than just sdio
>
> Here is the whole resulting function. I think this is clear enough:
>
> static bool mmc_host_may_gate_card(struct mmc_card *card)
> {
>
> /* If there is no card we may gate it */
> if (!card)
> return true;
> /*
> * Don't gate SDIO cards! These need to be clocked at all times
> * since they may be independent systems generating interrupts
> * and other events. The clock requests counter from the core will
> * go down to zero since the core does not need it, but we will not
> * gate the clock, because there is somebody out there that may still
> * be using it.
> */
> return !(card->quirks & MMC_QUIRK_BROKEN_CLK_GATING);
>
>
> }
> Pierre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists