linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] KVM updates for the 2.6.38 merge window

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:31:21 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM updates for the 2.6.38 merge window

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> - asynchronous page faults, which allow a guest to continue processing
> interrupts even when its memory is being paged in; in the case of a Linux
> 2.6.38+ guest, it will receive a notification that the host is servicing a
> page fault, and may switch into another guest process

So quite frankly, I don't like how this was done.

When you touch files like mm/memory.c, you don't just touch them. You
get sign-offs and acks from the VM maintainers. Seriously.

In this case, I pulled, looked, and then unpulled. I just don't want
it, and I think the new FAULT_FLAG_MINOR is seriously mis-named and
hacky.

Is it about atomicity? Is it about IO? Why wasn't I notified
before-hand? Was Andrew cc'd?

Not pulled.

                     Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/