[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimS0-ih=WZ_GvPi9NFjbYMT4OctWV943ri4GuTD@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 05:47:13 +0900
From: "Kuwahara,T." <6vvetjsrt26xsrzlh1z0zn4d2grdah@...il.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...ux.it>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 02/13] ntp: add ADJ_SETOFFSET mode bit
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Richard Cochran
<richardcochran@...il.com> wrote:
> the PTP Hardware Clocks for which this whole patch
> set was created in the first place will keep their time as TAI.
Are you sure of that? I don't have the standard handy (it's non-free,
right?) but it seems that the Annex B states differently. But that's
not the point anyway. My concern is that your patch not only adds the
useless (and broken) feature to the existing syscall but also makes a
permanent change to the public interface for your own use. That's
what I'm against. So if you stop touching the struct timex, I won't
complain anymore.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists