linux-kernel - [PATCH] Move an assert under DEBUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D2AC4D5.5070503@parallels.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Jan 2011 02:35:33 -0600
From:	Rob Landley <rlandley@...allels.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	<trivial@...nel.org>, <linux-net@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Move an assert under DEBUG_KERNEL. (attempt 2)

On 01/06/2011 05:41 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Probably a worthwhile thing to do, IMO.  If there's some net-specific
> CONFIG_DEBUG_ setting then that wold be a better thing to use.
> 
> However the patch was a) wordwrapped, b) space-stuffed and c) not cc'ed
> to the networking list.  So its prospects are dim.

Ok, either I've beaten thunderbird into submission, or I'll be submitting a patch to Documentation/email-clients.txt.  (Whether or not I need to find a different smtp server to send this through remains an open question.)

(Confirming: I looked for a more specific DEBUG symbol, but couldn't find one.  I can add one, but this seems a bit small to have its own symbol, and DEBUG_KERNEL is already used in a few *.c files.)

From: Rob Landley <rlandley@...allels.com>

Move an assert under DEBUG_KERNEL.  (Minor cleanup to save a few bytes.)

Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <rlandley@...allels.com>
---

 include/linux/rtnetlink.h |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/rtnetlink.h b/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
index bbad657..28c4025 100644
--- a/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
+++ b/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
@@ -782,6 +782,7 @@ extern struct netdev_queue *dev_ingress_queue_create(struct net_device *dev);
 extern void rtnetlink_init(void);
 extern void __rtnl_unlock(void);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL
 #define ASSERT_RTNL() do { \
 	if (unlikely(!rtnl_is_locked())) { \
 		printk(KERN_ERR "RTNL: assertion failed at %s (%d)\n", \
@@ -789,6 +790,9 @@ extern void __rtnl_unlock(void);
 		dump_stack(); \
 	} \
 } while(0)
+#else
+#define ASSERT_RTNL()
+#endif
 
 static inline u32 rtm_get_table(struct rtattr **rta, u8 table)
 {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/