[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1294652296.17779.299.camel@pasglop>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:38:16 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pci, usb: Seperate usb handoff func to another file
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 23:01 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On 01/09/2011 01:09 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > acceptable ?
> >
> > I think if you want to make the handoff happen -that- early, you have
> > basically two options. One is to move it all to arch code, and the other
> > one is to create early-boot "fake" struct pci_dev & bus that have the
> > config callbacks implemented pointing to the early stuff. You can do
> > that entirely within your arch code, and avoids most of the grossness
> > above in the generic places.
>
> good idea, will make one get_early_pci_dev() for x86 as dummy device.
>
> >
> > It would avoid that turd too:
> >
> >> +#include "usb_handoff.c"
>
> may still need that to avoid some MMIO bar finding and remapping etc.
Might be better to test for system state... a bit ugly too but less than
#include'ing the C file.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists