[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1294731467.17779.352.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:37:47 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 1/4] pci, usb: Make usb handoff func all take base
remapping
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 22:34 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> system_state does not work.
> it only have BOOTING and RUNNING ...
> RUNNING is set in init/main.c::init_post().
> so early_quirk and pci_quirk all with BOOTING stage...
Or we can make msleep() itself safe...
Ben.
> slab_is_available() could be used, but looks alike abuse.
>
> >
> > We could even wrap it into a safe_delay() function or whatever (in
> fact
> > why not make msleep() itself safe ? It's not like it was timing
> critical
> > code :-)
>
> like
> void safe_udelay(unsigned long usecs)
> {
> if (slab_is_available())
> udelay(usecs)
> else
> early_udelay(usecs);
> }
>
> or wonder if you are happy with
>
> void __weak safe_udelay(unsigned long usecs)
> {
> udelay(usecs);
> }
>
> and will have x86 have it's own safe_udelay...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists