[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110111124658.GA4507@zhy>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:46:58 +0800
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To: Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 1/2] [PATCH -tip 1/2] sched: Reinstate group names
in /proc/sched_debug.
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 03:41:54PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> sched: Reinstate group names in /proc/sched_debug.
>
> Displaying of group names in /proc/sched_debug was dropped in autogroup
> patches. Add group names while displaying cfs_rq and tasks information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched_debug.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/kernel/sched_debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_debug.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
> #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
> #include <linux/utsname.h>
>
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sched_debug_lock);
I don't get your point on introducing this lock.
Just to avoid concurrent access?
Or could you explain please?
Thanks,
Yong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists