[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201101110105.54166.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 01:05:53 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux-pm mailing list" <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Make cpuidle_enable_device() call poll_idle_init()
On Tuesday, January 11, 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 11, 2011, Len Brown wrote:
> > > /**
> > > * cpuidle_enable_device - enables idle PM for a CPU
> > > * @dev: the CPU
> > > @@ -176,6 +215,8 @@ int cpuidle_enable_device(struct cpuidle
> > > ret = __cpuidle_register_device(dev);
> > > if (ret)
> > > return ret;
> > > + } else {
> > > + poll_idle_init(dev);
> > > }
> >
> > how about calling poll_idle_init() unconditionally here
> > and deleting the call to it from within __cpuidle_register_device()?
>
> Fine by me, as long as poll_idle_init() is called before the conditional. :-)
In fact, it even doesn't need to be called before the conditional.
So fine by me anyway.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists