[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D2C6260.80403@gaisler.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:00:00 +0100
From: Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@...sler.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] TTY/serial merge for .38
Greg KH wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 02:44:14PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
>>On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Here is the big tty and serial merge for .38. I'll be sending another
>>>smaller one that just moves drivers around after .38-rc1 is out, as is
>>>the norm for file moves to handle issues with other trees syncing up
>>>properly.
>>>
>>>
>>Merged. However, the drivers/serial/apbuart.c file conflicted, and
>>both sides of the merge had some insanity in them.
>>
>>So I did an "evil merge" - a merge that actually changed the code to
>>match neither side - and it looks better to me. But maybe that's just
>>the drugs I'm taking talking.
>>
>>So people should check it out. In particular, look at the interaction
>>of "drivers: serial: apbuart: Handle OF failures gracefully" and the
>>"Added support for ampopts in APBUART driver. Used in AMP systems"
>>commit.
>>
>>
>
>The merge looks ok to me, but I don't have this hardware, so I can't
>test it. Thomas, can you verify this is ok?
>
>
The code looks good and I have tested on the APBUART hardware - it works.
Thanks,
Daniel Hellstrom
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists