| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:50:20 +0100 From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net> To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com, jj@...osbits.net, daniel.baluta@...il.com, jochen@...hen.org, hagen@...u.net, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, pavel@....cz Subject: Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol Am Dienstag, den 11.01.2011, 18:01 +0100 schrieb Eric Dumazet: > Le mardi 11 janvier 2011 à 17:48 +0100, stefani@...bold.net a écrit : > > From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net> > > > ... > > The implementation is clean and has absolut no side effects to the network > > subsystems so i ask for merge it into linux, mm-tree or linux-next. > > > > The patch is against the current linux git tree > > > > - Stefani > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net> > > --- > > > > Reading again UDPCP specs, I find it is IPv4/IPv6 agnostic > > You copied IPv4 UDP code, so this only handles IPv4... > Right, but currently there is no need for an IPV6 implementation, non of our base station provide it and non of our mobile network customers use it. If it will be required in the future it will be implemented. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists