linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3 V13] RO/NX protection for loadable kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D2CDCE7.6030002@free.fr>
Date:	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:42:47 +0100
From:	matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>
To:	Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@...il.com>,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@....de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Siarhei Liakh <sliakh.lkml@...il.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 V13] RO/NX protection for loadable kernel

Kees Cook a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> I was just shown this[1] on Xen from an Ubuntu bug report[2].
> 
> [    1.230382] NX-protecting the kernel data: 3884k
> [    1.231002] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at c1782ae0
> ...
> [    1.231145] Call Trace:
> [    1.231152]  [<c0138481>] ? __change_page_attr+0x2c1/0x370
> [    1.231161]  [<c02163a1>] ? __purge_vmap_area_lazy+0xc1/0x180
> [    1.231169]  [<c013857c>] ? __change_page_attr_set_clr+0x4c/0xb0
> [    1.231176]  [<c0138838>] ? change_page_attr_set_clr+0x128/0x300
> [    1.231183]  [<c010798e>] ? __raw_callee_save_xen_restore_fl+0x6/0x8
> [    1.231192]  [<c0159ca1>] ? vprintk+0x171/0x3f0
> [    1.231198]  [<c0138bdf>] ? set_memory_nx+0x5f/0x70
> 
> 
> Does Xen have different size page table allocations or something weird?
> 
Note that this one isn't related to this one but to "Add NX protection for kernel data".

But have no idea how xen page table work.

Matthieu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/