[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110112132346.GC10920@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:23:46 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: oleg@...hat.com, roland@...hat.com, jan.kratochvil@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET RFC] ptrace,signal: clean transition between STOPPED
and TRACED
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 03:00:50PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> This patchset is spun off from "ptrace,signal: sane interaction
> between ptrace and job control signals, take#2" patchset[1]. From the
> series, four fix and cleanup patches were put into git branch
> ptrace-reviewed[2]. This patchset is the subset which tries to fix
> problems with the actual group stop mechanism and make the transition
> between STOPPED and TRACED clean.
Roland, Jan, what do you guys think?
Thank you.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists