[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikgBBEznAh1CRwJk5MgorNFpXvRuVLyhYT6sQvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:42:15 +0100
From: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] epoll: remove unnecessary bit operation in epoll_create1 syscall
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com> wrote:
> @flags can have O_CLOEXEC only so bitwise AND is not necessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/eventpoll.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
> index 8cf07242067d..2e21fb85b8b6 100644
> --- a/fs/eventpoll.c
> +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
> @@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(epoll_create1, int, flags)
> * a file structure and a free file descriptor.
> */
> error = anon_inode_getfd("[eventpoll]", &eventpoll_fops, ep,
> - O_RDWR | (flags & O_CLOEXEC));
> + O_RDWR | flags);
I'm strong against this.
Whenever a new flag is allowed this will explode...
> if (error < 0)
> ep_free(ep);
>
> --
> 1.7.3.4.600.g982838b0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists