linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/9] X86/perf: fix power:cpu_idle double end events and throw cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:16:54 +0100
From:	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	arjan@...ux.intel.com, j-pihet@...com,
	Robert Schoene <robert.schoene@...dresden.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] X86/perf: fix power:cpu_idle double end events and throw cpu_idle events from the cpuidle layer

On Wednesday 12 January 2011 07:42:59 Len Brown wrote:
> I'm happy to see the trace point move up into cpuidle from intel_idle.
> 
> If somebody is picking this up in a perf tree,
> Acked-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> 
> else I can put it in the idle tree, let me know.
I didn't know you have an idle tree.

If you can push this one through the idle tree that would be great.

I'll go through the rest of my patches and resubmit
in some days as soon as some things are clarified.

But I need this one to still be included in .38.
Please tell me if this could be a problem.

Thanks,

  Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/