[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimAFp7ORrJLw2d8-i5pK0MZGTyAN5kmRR37ky1v@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:05:19 -0600
From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@...aro.org>
To: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
Subject: Re: ARM: relocation out of range (when loading a module)
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de> wrote:
> Hello,
[...]
> INIT_CALLS
> CON_INITCALL
> SECURITY_INITCALL
> + /*
> + * TODO: The size of INIT_RAM_FS could easily reach a
> + * point (~16MB) when loading modules will fail because
> + * relocations will be out of range. So this place here
> + * isn't the best one.
> + */
> INIT_RAM_FS
In general, do we expect always to be able to avoid the situation
where branches in the kernel may need to cover too large a range ...
and is there any strategy for working aroung it?
If we have problems branching from the modules area into vmlinux, we
could possibly build modules with -fPIC : this would remove the
restriction on branch range, though there would also be some
performance impact for the modules...
Cheers
---Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists