linux-kernel - Re: Q: perf log mode?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110112170716.GB24598@ghostprotocols.net>
Date:	Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:07:17 -0200
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
To:	Kirill Smelkov <kirr@....spb.ru>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Q: perf log mode?

Em Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 07:31:32PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov escreveu:
> As I wrote in my first mail, maybe a bit not explicitly (sorry then), the
> latency is introduced in perf-record. I'm telling this because I've

Ok, all is well and we'll tune the kernel to do it as we need using your
patch.

> visually monitored perf-record output to console (yes, binary output,
> but it does not matter) to see whether there is output progress at all.
> 
> After initial startup there was no progress for long time and then bunch
> of data after 30-40 seconds.
> 
> 
> And with the patch posted inline within reply-to-Peter mail, the delay
> goes away, so could you please consider applying it?

I will.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/