linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] thermal: depends on NET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1101120008590.19140@x980>
Date:	Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:18:39 -0500 (EST)
From:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Zimny Lech <napohybelskurwysynom2010@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] thermal: depends on NET

> > --- linux-next-20101213.orig/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> > +++ linux-next-20101213/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> >  
> >  menuconfig THERMAL
> >  	tristate "Generic Thermal sysfs driver"
> > +	depends on NET

I've added this line to the offending patch.

While I agree that randconfig build testing
is theoretically useful, in recent memory
its results do not seem particularly relevant
to useful configs.

Perhaps it would be a good idea to spend some time
making non-useful configs impossible, and thus focus
the testing where it will be of more benefit?

thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/