linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/35] writeback: safety margin for bdi stat error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110113104154.GA5309@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:41:54 +0800
From:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/35] writeback: safety margin for bdi stat error

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 06:38:34PM +0800, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 13-01-11 12:14:40, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 05:59:49AM +0800, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > So the root cause is, the bdi_dirty is well under the global nr_dirty
> > > > due to accounting errors. This can be fixed by using bdi_stat_sum(),
> > >   So which statistic had the big error? I'd just like to understand
> > > this (and how come your patch improves the situation)...
> > 
> > bdi_stat_error() = nr_cpu_ids * BDI_STAT_BATCH
> >                  = 8 * (8*(1+ilog2(8)))
> >                  = 8 * 8 * 4
> >                  = 256 pages
> >                  = 1MB
>   Yes, my question was more aiming at on which statistics the error happens
> so that it causes problems for you. Thinking about it now I suppose you
> observe that bdi_nr_writeback + bdi_nr_reclaimable < bdi_thresh but in fact
> the number of pages is higher than bdi_thresh because of accounting errors.
> And thus we are able to reach global dirty limit and the tasks get
> throttled heavily. Am I right?

Yes, exactly.

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/