[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m34o9c8ual.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:42:26 +0100
From: Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@...il.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
2nddept-manager@....hitachi.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf-probe: make "perf-probe -L <function>" display the absolute path and absolute line number
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com> writes:
> (2011/01/13 19:20), Franck Bui-Huu wrote:
>> From: Franck Bui-Huu <fbuihuu@...il.com>
>>
>> It should be more usefull to get the full location of the function
>
>> (absolute line number + full path) instead of repeating the name of
>> the function and the start line number given by the command line.
>>
>> So we had before:
>>
>> $ perf probe -L schedule | head -n3
>> <schedule:0>
>> 0 asmlinkage void __sched schedule(void)
>> 1 {
>>
>> and now we get:
>>
>> $ perf probe -L schedule | head -n3
>> </usr/src/debug/kernel-2.6.35.fc14/linux-2.6.35.x86_64/kernel/sched.c:3813>
>> 0 asmlinkage void __sched schedule(void)
>> 1 {
>
> Indeed, it could be useful for users to see where the function is...
>
> However, I think that should be optional, because the output lines
> have the relative line numbers from the function, and those numbers
> are important for users who want to probe a specific line by using
> function relative line numbers. e.g. "schedule:10"
>
> And with that option, I'd suggest to show absolute line numbers on each line.
>
> $ perf probe -L schedule:0-1 --by-source
> </usr/src/debug/kernel-2.6.35.fc14/linux-2.6.35.x86_64/kernel/sched.c:3813>
> 3813 asmlinkage void __sched schedule(void)
> 3814 {
>
> Or, just show source file as an additional information.
>
> $ perf probe -L schedule:0-1
> <schedule@...r/src/debug/kernel-2.6.35.fc14/linux-2.6.35.x86_64/kernel/sched.c:0>
> 0 asmlinkage void __sched schedule(void)
> 1 {
>
> I just would like to keep the consistency of the output/input format.
Well, for consistency, I thought that the additional information (given
inside angle brackets) should always be the same: a full path and an
absolute line number which clearly identify which source file perf-probe
is listing.
--
Franck
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists