linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] core block bits for 2.6.38

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110113214308.GA18104@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:43:08 +0000
From:	Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] core block bits for 2.6.38

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 09:05:40PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com> wrote:
> > I see Tejun already posted a fix, but Milan says it does not work.
> > Tejun, any  updates?
> 
> Hmmm... seems like I missed something.  Unfortunately, it's already a
> bit too late here.  I'll get back to it tomorrow afternoon.  The issue
> is mostly cosmetic so if it can wait a day or two I don't think
> reverting is necessary.
 
It's only cosmetic if your system is not relying upon userspace programs
that rely upon it:)   My vote would be for reverting the patch for now
so we can be sure the existing userspace functionality continues to work
in -rc1.

Alasdair

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/