[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110113220039.GF31800@thunk.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:00:39 -0500
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: clearcache (Was: Re: [git pull] vfs pile 1)
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 09:42:39PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> "I didn't really follow the discussion at Kernel Summit, but there seemed
> to be some question as to whether the cleancache stuff will be merged or
> not. It missed 2.6.37 (obviously), but my question now is do I keep in
> in linux-next in the hope that it will be merged in 2.6.38? Or is that
> not going to happen?"
The real problem is I don't think anyone is really paying attention to
cleancache.
Dan, something that might be useful to drive interest would be a
demonstration of this improves performance on, say, a netbook using
cleancache and zram, and how it is better than just using zram
directly as a swap device. With maybe some numbers? That might get
some interest from the community desktop distributions...
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists