linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] x86: Add safe_udelay() and safe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:48:52 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86: Add safe_udelay() and safe_msleep()

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 03:04:28PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > 
> > What the hell is the root problem ?
> 
> for patch
> 
> x86: usb handoff in early_quirk
> 
> some systems keep getting
>   APIC calibration not consistent with PM-Timer: 139ms instead of 100ms
>   APIC delta adjusted to PM-Timer: 831249 (1163736)
> 
> USB legacy SMI handler is not disabled at that time.

But is that causing a real problem?  You never answered that question
when I asked it in the past, which makes me think that all of this work
is for no good reason.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/