[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2426ea8f-7e52-4329-bf20-884c2b996f98@email.android.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:33:16 +0000
From: Jack Stone <jwjstone@...tmail.fm>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/eventpoll.c: fix compilation warning
Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@...com> wrote:
>This patch fixes following compilation warning
>fs/eventpoll.c:1119: warning: 'slack' may be used uninitialized in this
>function
>
>Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>
>---
> fs/eventpoll.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
>index 8cf0724..c24a032 100644
>--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
>+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
>@@ -1116,7 +1116,7 @@ static int ep_poll(struct eventpoll *ep, struct
>epoll_event __user *events,
> {
> int res, eavail, timed_out = 0;
> unsigned long flags;
>- long slack;
>+ long slack = 0;
> wait_queue_t wait;
> struct timespec end_time;
> ktime_t expires, *to = NULL;
I don't think this is the correct fix. This function is fine unless timeout is negative.
If a negative timeout is possible then this function will create timer far in the future. I'll leave it up to the maintainer how to solve that one. The two solutions I can see are making timeout unsigned or extending the bottom case of the if to <=0.
Either way we should use uninitalized_var() rather than setting it to zero.
Hope this makes sense,
Jack
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists