lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D30267B.9080406@hitachi.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:33:31 +0900
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To:	Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@...il.com>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	2nddept-manager@....hitachi.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf-probe: make "perf-probe -L <function>" display the
 absolute path and absolute line number

Hi Franck,

(2011/01/14 18:03), Franck Bui-Huu wrote:
> But if you think it should be used to hint for a probe point syntax,
> (you'll probably use copy & paste since it uses absolute path name),

Not only for copy&paste, but also for avoiding confusion.
Please imagine that user see this output.

   </usr/src/debug/kernel-2.6.35.fc14/linux-2.6.35.x86_64/kernel/sched.c:3823>
        10         rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
        11         rcu_note_context_switch(cpu);

"Why the definition line number and starting line number are different?"
"How I can put a probe?  sched.c:3823 ... + 10??"
"Or, it's just buggy! report it!"

I don't want this.

> then this patch is wrong.

Yeah, but just a _bit_. Basically, I agree with your idea of showing
actual path of the function, because, indeed, perf-probe just shows
the first one even if there are many same-name functions.

So, here, I had suggested an enhancement idea;

  $ perf probe -L schedule:0-1
  <schedule@...r/src/debug/kernel-2.6.35.fc14/linux-2.6.35.x86_64/kernel/sched.c:0>
        0  asmlinkage void __sched schedule(void)
        1  {

This is acceptable, because it shows which function you see and
it also gives you how you can specify a probe point on a function
line.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
2nd Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Systems Development Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ