linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/execbuffer: Clear domains before beginning reloc processing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTinq9MOjvHVFb1eJ_Dt+vkgpixuUrU-xcDYGZ5Lj@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:37:20 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/execbuffer: Clear domains before beginning reloc processing

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>
> They will be in drm-intel-fixes. There have been a couple of other patches,
> for the compiler warning, the typo that Indan spotted and for modparam to
> workaround the U160, so I'll send the pull request it via Dave.

My tree has been in a known-broken state for too damn long now. Please
send the pull request to me directly. Dave may be flooded out in
Brisbane or something.

And if you're not certain about some of the other changes, just tell
me, and I'll apply the fix patches only. Or I will revert the thing
that caused the problem. Having a known-broken tree without the fixes
in it is _not_ acceptable, it just makes testing harder for everybody
else!

                           Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/