linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: set percpu cpu0 lpj to default

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:16:16 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: set percpu cpu0 lpj to default

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 01:22:32PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 
> We need to use udelay() in early stage.

I still don't agree with this.

Again, _please_ post your real patches that require this, after
explaining exactly _why_ this is needed at all, and what real problem it
is solving.

You seem to be totally ignoring this request I've made numerous times,
which isn't appreciated at all.  So I'm guessing that we should also
ignore your patches as well?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/