lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 15 Jan 2011 19:54:01 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To:	walter harms <wharms@....de>
Cc:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] [SCSI] target: dubious one-bit signed bitfield

On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 05:36:11PM +0100, walter harms wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 15.01.2011 15:04, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > The signed one-bit types can be 0 or -1 which can cause a problem if
> > someone ever checks if (foo->lu_gp_assoc == 1).  The current code is
> > fine because everyone just checks zero vs non-zero.  But Sparse
> > complains about it so lets change it.  The warnings look like this:
> > 
> 
> Your code looks ok,
> but to avoid that kind of errors it may be better to use int here.
> 

I'm afraid I don't understand what you are saying.

regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ