| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20110114235437.669f820d@queued.net> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 23:54:37 -0800 From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net> To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: don't attempt to use hest_tab unless !acpi_pci_disabled On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 23:24:27 -0500 (EST) Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> wrote: [...] > > This patch causes apei_hest_parse to check both hest_disabled and > > acpi_pci_disabled before continuing. With it, the XO-1 boots > > properly. > > The X0-1 has no ACPI support, and thus you are running > with acpi_disabled=1, yes? The XO-1 has no ACPI support, but ACPI support is enabled in the kernel (as the XO-1.5 does have ACPI support, and the same kernel is used between both) and I'm not passing any arguments to the kernel regarding it. The kernel's ACPI code detects that it's not there and disables it (the kernel message that's seen is "ACPI: Interpreter disabled.") This is what sets apci_pci_disabled to 1; I'm not doing it manually. > > It would be better for the fix to depend on acpi_disabled. > acpi_disbled=1 is a supported configuration, while > acpi_pci_disabled is a just a debug flag, maybe someday > it will go away. Ah, ok. The reason I went with acpi_pci_disabled is because that's acpi_pci_root_init() checks, and that's what specifies whether or not acpi_hest_init gets called.. but it's all the same to me. :) > > Looks like acpi_hest_init() bails for acpi_disabled, > and thus hest_ghes_dev_register()doens't run and invoke > apei_hest_parse(), so we are set there. > > Seems like drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_acpi.c, > should not invoke apei_hest_parse() when acpi_disabled=1. > Either that or we have to have apei_hest_parse(), > which is exported to modules check acpi_disabled -- > and its callers need to check for failure. >From a safety standpoint, I'd prefer to have apei_hest_parse check for acpi_disabled, rather than relying on clients to know to check for it. Here's an updated patch. From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net> I've hit the following oops on boot on an XO-1: [ 0.662755] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000024 [ 0.666349] IP: [<c11a0514>] apei_hest_parse+0xbc/0xcc [ 0.666349] *pde = 00000000 [ 0.666349] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 0.666349] last sysfs file: [ 0.666349] Modules linked in: [ 0.666349] [ 0.666349] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.37+ #74 / [ 0.666349] EIP: 0060:[<c11a0514>] EFLAGS: 00010206 CPU: 0 [ 0.666349] EIP is at apei_hest_parse+0xbc/0xcc [ 0.666349] EAX: 00000028 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000 [ 0.666349] ESI: 00000001 EDI: 00000000 EBP: c1161171 ESP: cb441fa8 [ 0.666349] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 [ 0.666349] Process swapper (pid: 1, ti=cb440000 task=cb43c000 task.ti=cb440000) [ 0.666349] Stack: [ 0.666349] c1450960 00000001 00000020 c141fa10 c11611aa c141fa1e c1001151 00000000 [ 0.666349] c1450960 00000001 00000020 00000000 c1401346 00000000 c1401221 00000000 [ 0.666349] c10034be 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 0.666349] Call Trace: [ 0.666349] [<c141fa10>] ? aer_service_init+0x0/0x22 [ 0.666349] [<c11611aa>] ? aer_acpi_firmware_first+0x15/0x22 [ 0.666349] [<c141fa1e>] ? aer_service_init+0xe/0x22 [ 0.666349] [<c1001151>] ? do_one_initcall+0x68/0x10f [ 0.666349] [<c1401346>] ? kernel_init+0x125/0x19d [ 0.666349] [<c1401221>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x19d [ 0.666349] [<c10034be>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10 [ 0.666349] Code: 76 18 0f b7 40 02 50 68 c2 ae 35 c1 e8 3e e8 0f 00 b8 ea ff ff ff 59 5b eb 1c 89 fa ff d5 85 c0 75 14 89 f0 43 8b 0d 50 ed 3f c1 <3b> 59 24 0f 82 64 ff ff ff 31 c0 5b 5e 5f 5d c3 8b 50 0c 8d 4a The apei_hest_parse function is using hest_tab, which hasn't been initialized. This is because acpi_hest_init has never been called (as acpi_pci_disabled is 1, so it never gets called from acpi_pci_root_init), and hest_disabled is never set to 1. When the aer_driver calls apei_hest_parse, the hest_disabled check passes, and it oopses processing hest_tab. This patch causes apei_hest_parse to check both hest_disabled and acpi_disabled before continuing. Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net> --- drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c index 4ee58e7..7262eaf 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ int apei_hest_parse(apei_hest_func_t func, void *data) struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr; int i, rc, len; - if (hest_disable) + if (hest_disable || acpi_disabled) return -EINVAL; hest_hdr = (struct acpi_hest_header *)(hest_tab + 1); -- 1.7.2.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists