[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110115110848.GL19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:08:48 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: sedat.dilek@...il.com
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 15 (Call Trace in fs/dcache.c +
autofs4)
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:00:54PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > Argh... ??In __do_follow_link() replace
> >
> > ?? ?? ?? ??if (link->mnt != nd->path.mnt)
> > with
> > ?? ?? ?? ??if (link->mnt == nd->path.mnt)
> >
> > Mismerge yesterday ;-/ ??I've pushed fix for that in for-next, will fold
> > shortly. ??As for autofs4 breakage, I've a preliminary fix, testing it
> > now.
> >
>
> Hey, cool and thanks.
>
> Not sure if you catched them all, I have noticed on my latest
> ("buggy") linux-next kernel these Call Traces when doing an
> update-grub.
That might be vfsmount being dropped when it shouldn't or dentry leaked.
And seeing that it's umount(8), I would suspect the latter...
Anyway, with the latest from dhowells we probably should have
d_set_d_op() mess on autofs4 under control (in #for-next). Whether
it's enough to actually fix the sucker is a separate question, of
course - there might very well be more crap.
I've instrumented mntput() et.al. here; hopefully that'll make catching
the remaining turds easier. As for dcache leaks... ouch. Could you
try to reproduce that one on the mainline kernel? At least that'd
isolate things a bit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists