[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36b8bc65-0f28-4730-84ee-6c03c6453cbe@email.android.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:11:38 +0000
From: Jack Stone <jwjstone@...tmail.fm>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] kernel/async.c: fixing compilation warnings
"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>On 1/14/2011 10:39 AM, Jack Stone wrote:
>> On 14/01/2011 15:27, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>> On 1/14/2011 5:13 AM, Jack Stone wrote:
>>>> rning: ‘calltime.tv64’ may be used uninitialized in this function
>>> which is clearly a.. gcc funny to be honest. it's a false positive
>by
>>> any stretch.
>>>
>> Agreed. Who should merge this?
>
>should it be?
>traditionally we have shied away for workarounds for false positives
>from gcc.....
I don't mind. I thought that was what uninitalized_var() was for.
Thanks,
Jack
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists