linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/7] allow killing tasks in your own or child userns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 15 Jan 2011 00:31:14 +0000
From:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To:	Bastian Blank <bastian@...di.eu.org>,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] allow killing tasks in your own or child userns

Quoting Bastian Blank (bastian@...di.eu.org):
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 01:31:52AM +0000, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Bastian Blank (bastian@...di.eu.org):
> > > What is this flag used for anyway? I only see it used in the accounting
> > > stuff, and if every user can get it, it is not longer useful.
> > hm, I'm not sure...  maybe noone is using it!
> 
> This flag is from pre-git.
> 
> The only information is:
> | #define ASU                0x02    /* ... used super-user privileges */
> 
> However with your patches (or at least the goal), everyone is super-user
> in derived namespaces.

No, a task just sitting in a derived ns won't necessarily need/use
super-user privileges...  (and, if we ever get far enough along, it
won't even necessarily have CAP_SYS_ADMIN/etc targeted to the parent
userns, bc it won't need those to do the unshares).

thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/