[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikZ+MmM9f0tidpccDAimtUkDvJ3N=3KE+xFxc63@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 13:05:15 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ia64 broken by transparent huge pages - other arches too?
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> This is insane. Having such a massively invasive change to the whole mm,
> barely tested on most architecture, and last I heard still generally
> controversial being merged like that without even some integration
> testing via -next makes no sense.
>
> Linus, wtf is going on ?
I pretty much take anything from Andrew, unless I hate it (and the
latest version of the transparent huge-page was ok).
That said, I did think that Andrew's -mm tree was in -next, and there
clearly is some serious problem wrt -mm and -next if this wasn't
caught earlier there.
I was also expecting the fixups to come through Andrew, and they
haven't. I can apply whatever people agree is sane, but right now I
don't even know what the final patch for this problem is.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists