[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110116111616.GC2456@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 13:16:16 +0200
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: fixup headers_check
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:07:32AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 12:46:22 +0200, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> wrote:
> > Drop the following headers_check errors:
> > /linux-2.6/usr/include/drm/drm_mode.h:85: found
> > __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include <linux/types.h>
> > /linux-2.6/usr/include/drm/i915_drm.h:120: found
> > __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include <linux/types.h>
> > /linux-2.6/usr/include/drm/mga_drm.h:260: found
> > __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include <linux/types.h>
> > /linux-2.6/usr/include/drm/radeon_drm.h:758: found
> > __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include <linux/types.h>
> > /linux-2.6/usr/include/drm/via_drm.h:117: found
> > __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include <linux/types.h>
> >
> > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
> > ---
> > include/drm/drm_mode.h | 2 ++
> > include/drm/i915_drm.h | 1 +
> > include/drm/mga_drm.h | 1 +
> > include/drm/radeon_drm.h | 1 +
> > include/drm/via_drm.h | 1 +
> > 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mode.h b/include/drm/drm_mode.h
> > index 0fc7397..1678d7b 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_mode.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_mode.h
> > @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
> > #ifndef _DRM_MODE_H
> > #define _DRM_MODE_H
> >
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > +
>
> Would
>
> #if 0
> #include <linux/types.h> /* silence make header_check */
> #endif
>
> be an acceptable compromise?
Why would you want to do that ? I truly have those types in use.
headers_check seems to be reporting correctly.
--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists