linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v2] vmx: increase ple

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D3311FA.8020202@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:42:50 +0200
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
CC:	"Zhai, Edwin" <edwin.zhai@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"mtosatti@...hat.com" <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] vmx: increase ple_gap default to 64

On 01/04/2011 04:51 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On some CPUs, a ple_gap of 41 is simply insufficient to ever trigger
> PLE exits, even with the minimalistic PLE test from kvm-unit-tests.
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/kvm-unit-tests.git;a=commitdiff;h=eda71b28fa122203e316483b35f37aaacd42f545
>
> For example, the Xeon X5670 CPU needs a ple_gap of at least 48 in
> order to get pause loop exits:
>
> # modprobe kvm_intel ple_gap=47
> # taskset 1 /usr/local/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -device testdev,chardev=log -chardev stdio,id=log -kernel x86/vmexit.flat -append ple-round-robin -smp 2
> VNC server running on `::1:5900'
> enabling apic
> enabling apic
> ple-round-robin 58298446
> # rmmod kvm_intel
> # modprobe kvm_intel ple_gap=48
> # taskset 1 /usr/local/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -device testdev,chardev=log -chardev stdio,id=log -kernel x86/vmexit.flat -append ple-round-robin -smp 2
> VNC server running on `::1:5900'
> enabling apic
> enabling apic
> ple-round-robin 36616
>
> Increase the ple_gap to 128 to be on the safe side.  Is this enough
> for a CPU with HT that has a busy sibling thread, or should it be
> even larger?   On the X5670, loading up the sibling thread with an
> infinite loop does not seem to increase the required ple_gap.
>

Applied, thanks.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/