linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 05/24] arm: introduce little-endian bitops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110116175109.GC13615@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:51:09 +0000
From:	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/24] arm: introduce little-endian bitops

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:08:34PM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> Introduce little-endian bit operations by renaming native ext2 bit
> operations.  The ext2 bit operations are kept as wrapper macros using
> little-endian bit operations to maintain bisectability until the
> conversions are finished.

This looks fine to me - is there any chance we can get this in to mainline
so we can avoid conflicts between this and some patches I'm working on atm
to fix the unsafe UP+SMP kernel combination with ARMs bitops ?

It's doing some stuff which needs to be done anyway (the casting to
unsigned long pointers for the ext2/minix find bit functions) which
otherwise will be duplicated in my patches.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/