[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5fc7c1cdc4aed93c1dbe7a3d1916bb1c.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:33:59 +0100
From: "Hans Verkuil" <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: "halli manjunatha" <manjunatha_halli@...com>
Cc: mchehab@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V10 3/7] drivers:media:radio: wl128x: FM Driver Common
sources
> Hi Hans and Mauro,
>
> If there are no major comments for the V10 of FM V4L2 driver, is it
> possible to take this driver (V10) to mainline?
>
> Since the files are becoming big to be posted as patches and
> maintaining it that way is a bit difficult. We can submit the patches
> to mainline to fix minor comments and also to add newer features
> (complete scan, stop seek) as patches once this driver makes its way
> in to mainline.
>
> Please let me know your views on this.
I have no objections in merging this for 2.6.39 or even 2.6.38 if Mauro is
willing.
Regards,
Hans
>
> Thanks,
> Manju
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Raja Mani <rajambsc@...il.com> wrote:
>> balbi,
>>
>> Agree , interrupt pkts could have handled in thread context . But in
>> the current way , FM driver never create any additional task in the
>> system
>> to handle FM interrupt. In fact, there is no task being created in
>> this driver to handle FM RDS data, AF,etc.
>>
>> This method is suitable for light weight system where we want to
>> reduce number of thread in the system.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 06:31:23AM -0500, manjunatha_halli@...com
>>> wrote:
>>>> From: Manjunatha Halli <manjunatha_halli@...com>
>>>>
>>>> These are the sources for the common interfaces required by the
>>>> FM V4L2 driver for TI WL127x and WL128x chips.
>>>>
>>>> These implement the FM channel-8 protocol communication with the
>>>> chip. This makes use of the Shared Transport as its transport.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Manjunatha Halli <manjunatha_halli@...com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
>>>
>>> looks like this is implementing a "proprietary" (by that I mean: for
>>> this driver only) IRQ API. Why aren't you using GENIRQ with threaded
>>> IRQs support ?
>>>
>>> Core IRQ Subsystem would handle a lot of stuff for you.
>>>
>>> --
>>> balbi
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media"
>>> in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Raja.
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media"
>> in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards
> Halli
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by Cisco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists