linux-kernel - Do GEODE_MFGPT_TIMER and GEODE_WDT really depend on MGEODE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110117003411.GA27646@hekate.rbi.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de>
Date:	Mon, 17 Jan 2011 01:34:11 +0100
From:	Martin Teufel <teufel@...ormatik.uni-frankfurt.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Do GEODE_MFGPT_TIMER and GEODE_WDT really depend on MGEODE_LX?

Hi,

since a few days I am running my own debian 2.6.32-5 on my ALIX machines
and the watchdogs (GEODE_MFGPT_TIMER, GEODE_WDT) are running and doing a
good job. Now I thought about an upstream solution for the debian stock
kernel but therefore need to know if GEODE_MFGPT_TIMER and GEODE_WDT
really depend on MGEODE_LX, as the Linux kernel configuration points
out.
In other words: Is it possible to compile a kernel with these drivers
which is not Geode LX specific (where MGEODE_LX is not set) and/or is it
possible to add these modules later by module-assistant (to a kernel
where MGEODE_LX is not set)?

Please note that I'm *not* on the mailing list, so please send me a CC
of your answer(s) - thanks.

Best regards,
Martin

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped