[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D35E378.70300@metafoo.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:01:12 +0100
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] asm-generic/io.h: Fix io{read,write}{16,32}be for big
endian systems
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/18/2011 07:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 January 2011 19:11:01 Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> Currently io{read,write}{16,32} expand to
>> *addr = cpu_to_leXX(cpu_to_beXX(val))
>> and
>> val = beXX_to_cpu(leXX_to_cpu(*addr))
>>
>> While it should rather be:
>> *addr = cpu_to_be{16,32}(val)
>> and
>> val = be{16,32}_to_cpu(*addr)
>>
>> The current implementation works on litte-endian targets(where cpu_to_leXX is a
>> noop), but breaks on on big-endian targets, this patch fixes it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
>
> The existing code looks broken on big-endian indeed, thanks
> for the report!
>
> However, you cannot use __raw_readl in general, because that
> function knows nothing about the various kinds of I/O accesses
> (potentially) handled by readl. Think of architectures where
> readl is not a pointer dereference but something else.
Well, i've though about that as well, but in the current asm-generic/io.h readl is
unconditionally defined as cpu_to_le32(__raw_readl(addr)) and ioread32 is defined as
readl.
So unless an arch io.h undefines those macros and redefines them (which none of the
current archs does, as far as i can see), we are o
If an arch chooses to redefine ioread or readl, it should probably also redefine
ioread{16,32}be.
>
> The right solution is probably to use swab16/swab32 for the
> big-endian functions. This also corrects the iowrite functions
> which really should be using cpu_to_be32 instead of be32_to_cpu
> (although they are always defined to be the same afaict.
This would first cause a conversion to little-endian, which is a swap() in the
generic case and then you would call swap() again on the result. Which is basically a
noop, but I'm not sure if compilers will detect this.
>
> Arnd
- - Lars
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk0143gACgkQBX4mSR26RiPJwACgh1KJKR6o5X/kazS34g/stGKq
OQ4AniZR7SlxTzpJDz7xTvPfeqAqH3S6
=Q6cD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists