[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-c5ed5145591774bd9a2960ba4ca45a02fc70aad1@git.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:06:37 GMT
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org, hpa@...or.com,
mingo@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf: Fix contexted inheritance
Commit-ID: c5ed5145591774bd9a2960ba4ca45a02fc70aad1
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/c5ed5145591774bd9a2960ba4ca45a02fc70aad1
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
AuthorDate: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:45:37 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:10:35 +0100
perf: Fix contexted inheritance
Linus reported that the RCU lockdep annotation bits triggered for this
rcu_dereference() because we're not holding rcu_read_lock().
Going over the code I cannot convince myself its correct:
- holding a ref on the parent_ctx, doesn't avoid it being uncloned
concurrently (as the comment says), so we can race with a free.
- holding parent_ctx->mutex doesn't avoid the above free from taking
place either, it would at best avoid parent_ctx from being freed.
I.e. the warning is correct. To fix the bug, serialize against the
unclone_ctx() call by extending the reach of the parent_ctx->lock.
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
kernel/perf_event.c | 11 +++++------
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
index b782b7a..76be4c7 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -6494,7 +6494,6 @@ int perf_event_init_context(struct task_struct *child, int ctxn)
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&parent_ctx->lock, flags);
parent_ctx->rotate_disable = 0;
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&parent_ctx->lock, flags);
child_ctx = child->perf_event_ctxp[ctxn];
@@ -6502,12 +6501,11 @@ int perf_event_init_context(struct task_struct *child, int ctxn)
/*
* Mark the child context as a clone of the parent
* context, or of whatever the parent is a clone of.
- * Note that if the parent is a clone, it could get
- * uncloned at any point, but that doesn't matter
- * because the list of events and the generation
- * count can't have changed since we took the mutex.
+ *
+ * Note that if the parent is a clone, the holding of
+ * parent_ctx->lock avoids it from being uncloned.
*/
- cloned_ctx = rcu_dereference(parent_ctx->parent_ctx);
+ cloned_ctx = parent_ctx->parent_ctx;
if (cloned_ctx) {
child_ctx->parent_ctx = cloned_ctx;
child_ctx->parent_gen = parent_ctx->parent_gen;
@@ -6518,6 +6516,7 @@ int perf_event_init_context(struct task_struct *child, int ctxn)
get_ctx(child_ctx->parent_ctx);
}
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&parent_ctx->lock, flags);
mutex_unlock(&parent_ctx->mutex);
perf_unpin_context(parent_ctx);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists