[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110118111455.8e75b086.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:14:55 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] memcg: fix LRU accounting with THP
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
memory cgroup's LRU stat should take care of size of pages because
Transparent Hugepage inserts hugepage into LRU.
If this value is the number wrong, memory reclaim will not work well.
Note: only head page of THP's huge page is linked into LRU.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: mmotm-0107/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-0107.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ mmotm-0107/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -814,7 +814,8 @@ void mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(struct page
* removed from global LRU.
*/
mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
- MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) -= 1;
+ /* huge page split is done under lru_lock. so, we have no races. */
+ MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) -= 1 << compound_order(page);
if (mem_cgroup_is_root(pc->mem_cgroup))
return;
VM_BUG_ON(list_empty(&pc->lru));
@@ -865,7 +866,8 @@ void mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(struct page
return;
mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
- MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) += 1;
+ /* huge page split is done under lru_lock. so, we have no races. */
+ MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) += 1 << compound_order(page);
SetPageCgroupAcctLRU(pc);
if (mem_cgroup_is_root(pc->mem_cgroup))
return;
@@ -2140,10 +2142,10 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_commit_charge(s
#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
#define PCGF_NOCOPY_AT_SPLIT ((1 << PCG_LOCK) | (1 << PCG_MOVE_LOCK) |\
- (1 << PCG_MIGRATION))
+ (1 << PCG_ACCT_LRU) | (1 << PCG_MIGRATION))
/*
* Because tail pages are not marked as "used", set it. We're under
- * 'splitting' and compund_lock. 'splitting' ensures that the pages
+ * 'splitting' and compund_lock and zone->lru_lock.
*/
void mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(struct page *head, struct page *tail)
{
@@ -2152,14 +2154,26 @@ void mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(struct
unsigned long flags;
/*
- * We have no races witch charge/uncharge but will have races with
+ * We have no races with charge/uncharge but will have races with
* page state accounting.
*/
move_lock_page_cgroup(head_pc, &flags);
tail_pc->mem_cgroup = head_pc->mem_cgroup;
smp_wmb(); /* see __commit_charge() */
- /* we don't need to copy all flags...*/
+ if (PageCgroupAcctLRU(head_pc)) {
+ enum lru_list lru;
+ struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
+
+ /*
+ * LRU flags cannot be copied because we need to add tail
+ * page to LRU by generic call and our hook will be called.
+ * We hold lru_lock, then, reduce counter directly.
+ */
+ lru = page_lru(head);
+ mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(head_pc);
+ MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) -= 1;
+ }
tail_pc->flags = head_pc->flags & ~PCGF_NOCOPY_AT_SPLIT;
move_unlock_page_cgroup(head_pc, &flags);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists