linux-kernel - Re: R_SPARC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110118.130027.28804895.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:00:27 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	richm@...elvet.org.uk
Cc:	609371@...s.debian.org, ben@...adent.org.uk,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	Jesper.Nilsson@...s.com, jeffm@...e.com
Subject: Re: R_SPARC_13

From: Richard Mortimer <richm@...elvet.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:23:14 +0000

> To close this off as a non-issue as far as my boot failures are
> concerned I did some further checking and objdump is displaying
> R_SPARC_OLO10 as two separate entries. I checked the scsi_mod.ko binary
> and found the appropriate Elf64_Rela entry. That has 0x21 as the LSB of
> r_info and that is the proper code for R_SPARC_OLO10 which is what you
> expected in the first place!

Thanks for figuring this out Richard.

I'll look into fixing binutils so that it properly reports the
correct R_SPARC_OLO10 relocation in dumps.  There really is no
excuse for what it's currently doing.  In fact, I think this
quirk has sent me on wild goose chases in the past.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/